Recommendation RG.3

Recommendation Status: New

Hold semi-annual comprehensive plan work sessions during which lead and supporting partners provide implementation progress and targets.

This recommendation helps achieve the following

Applicable Geographic Scales

Countywide

Municipalities

Key Issues Addressed

Equity considerations icon

Sustainability Considerations

Sustainability considerations icon

Sub-geographies

Equity Considerations

Continuous efforts to engage the community at large allows for greater resident participation and engagement with St. Louis County's future.

A more engaged community can help to align residents and stakeholders and bring additional resources and opportunities to support St. Louis County Government's efforts.

Related Planning Topic Areas

Not Sub-geographies
Complete Communities icon

Complete Communities

Responsible Growth icon

Responsible Growth

Countywide
Not Municipalities
Population Stagnation
Jobs-Skills Mismatch
Greater Housing Diversity & Affordability
Infrastructure Cost-burden
Social & Environmental Resilience
Open Space & Environment
Transportation & Infrastructure
Economic Development
Housing
Land Use & Development
Sustainable Infrastructure icon

Sustainable Infrastructure

Inclusive Economies icon

Inclusive Economies

Leading the Region icon

Leading the Region

Low
(Less than $1 mil)

Medium
($1-10mil)

Partnership

Implementation

Lead Partner(s)

  • St. Louis County Department of Planning

Lead Partner(s) icon
Supporting Partner(s) icon

Timeline

Ongoing

Near-term
(Within 5 Years)

Supporting Partner(s)

  • Rise Community Development

Project

Cost

High
($10+ mil)

Project, Partnership, or Policy

Policy

Medium-term
(5-10 Years)

Long-term
(10+ Years)

Potential Funding Sources

  • St. Louis County general operations

Not Project
Not Policy
Partnership

Tracking Implementation

Implementation tracker icon.

Offer updates by plugging into existing organizations focused on specific policy areas.

Tracking Success

  • Increase in developable sites.

  • Increase in housing units.

  • Increase in occupancy rates.

  • Reduction in utility expenses.

If overperforming, what should we do?

Reduce reporting of outcomes, possibly conducting work sessions every five years where indicators and outcomes may be more significant.

If underperforming, what should we do?

Previous
Previous

RG.2/Prioritize concentrating multi-family and mixed-income housing development an/PS/JSM/HDA/IC/SER

Next
Next

RG.4/Create overlay districts with design guidelines for key Countywide mixed-use /PS/JSM/HDA/IC/SER