Recommendation RG.3

Recommendation Status: New

Hold semi-annual comprehensive plan work sessions during which lead and supporting partners provide implementation progress and targets.

This recommendation helps achieve the following

Complete Communities icon
Responsible Growth icon
Sustainable Infrastructure icon

Complete Communities

Responsible
Growth

Sustainable Infrastructure

Inclusive Economies icon
Leading the Region icon

Inclusive Economies

Leading the Region

Key Issues Addressed

Population Stagnation
Greater Housing Diversity & Affordability
Social & Environmental Resilience
Infrastructure Cost-burden
Jobs-Skills Mismatch

Related Planning Topic Areas

Economic Development
Housing
Land Use & Development
Open Space & Environment
Transportation & Infrastructure

Applicable Geographic Scales

Countywide

Countywide

Municipalities

Not Municipalities

Sub-geographies

Not Sub-geographies

Equity Considerations

Continuous efforts to engage the community at large allows for greater resident participation and engagement with St. Louis County's future.

Equity considerations icon

Sustainability Considerations

A more engaged community can help to align residents and stakeholders and bring additional resources and opportunities to support St. Louis County Government's efforts.

Sustainability considerations icon

Implementation

Lead Partner(s)

  • St. Louis County Department of Planning

Lead Partner(s) icon

Supporting Partner(s)

Cost

Low
(Less than $1 mil)

Medium
($1-10mil)

High
($10+ mil)

Project, Partnership, or Policy

Not Project
Partnership
Not Policy

Project

Partnership

Policy

Timeline

  • Rise Community Development

Supporting Partner(s) icon

Medium-term
(5-10 Years)

Ongoing

Near-term
(Within 5 Years)

Long-term
(10+ Years)

Potential Funding Sources

  • St. Louis County general operations

Tracking Implementation

Tracking Success

  • Increase in developable sites.

  • Increase in housing units.

  • Increase in occupancy rates.

  • Reduction in utility expenses.

Implementation tracker icon.

If overperforming, what should we do?

Offer updates by plugging into existing organizations focused on specific policy areas.

If underperforming, what should we do?

Reduce reporting of outcomes, possibly conducting work sessions every five years where indicators and outcomes may be more significant.

Previous
Previous

RG.2/Prioritize concentrating multi-family and mixed-income housing development an/PS/JSM/HDA/IC/SER

Next
Next

RG.4/Create overlay districts with design guidelines for key Countywide mixed-use /PS/JSM/HDA/IC/SER