Recommendation LR.25

Recommendation Status: New

Implement travel demand management strategies to reduce single-occupant vehicle trips and Highway congestion by promoting multimodal transportation alternatives, including transit, biking, walking, and carpooling.

This recommendation help achieve the following

Applicable Geographic Scales

Countywide

Municipalities

Key Issues Addressed

Equity considerations icon

Sustainability Considerations

Sustainability considerations icon

Sub-geographies

Equity Considerations

Maintains safe and healthy mobility options for all.

Enhances traffic efficiency and reduces harmful emissions tied to high traffic congestion.

Related Planning Topic Areas

Not Sub-geographies
Responsible Growth icon

Responsible Growth

Leading the Region

Not Countywide
Municipalities
Population Stagnation
Not Jobs-Skills Mismatch
Not Greater Housing Diversity & Affordability
Not Social & Environmental Resilience
Infrastructure Cost-burden
Not Economic Development
Not Housing
Land Use & Development
Not Open Space & Environment
Transportation & Infrastructure

Low
(Less than $1 mil)

Medium
($1-10mil)

Partnership

Implementation

Lead Partner(s)

  • MoDOT

  • Metro Transit

Lead Partner(s) icon
Supporting Partner(s) icon

Timeline

Ongoing

Near-term
(Within 5 Years)

Supporting Partner(s)

  • EWGCOG

  • Municipalities

  • Regional Employers

Project

Cost

High
($10+ mil)

Project, Partnership, or Policy

Policy

Medium-term
(5-10 Years)

Long-term
(10+ Years)

Potential Funding Sources

  • N/A - Policy expected to generate net cost savings due to trip reduction and reduced road maintenance costs

Not Project
Not Partnership
Policy

Tracking Implementation

Implementation tracker icon.

Improve multi-modal infrastructure accessibility, enhance employer engagement in travel demand programs.

Tracking Success

  • The reduction in single-occupant vehicle trips during peak hours. And increase in mode share.

If overperforming, what should we do?

Coordinate with municipalities to implement similar policies building on county's success.

If underperforming, what should we do?

Previous
Previous

LR.24/Develop County guidelines for Autonomous Vehicle (AV) operation on public roads, priori/IC/SER

Next
Next

LR.26/Collaborate with Lambert International Airport to enhance infrastructure maintenance, w/IC/SER