Recommendation CC.49

Recommendation Status: New

Operationalize the inclusion of fiscal impact analyses and infrastructure requirements reporting in the County's development review process.

This recommendation help achieve the following

Applicable Geographic Scales

Countywide

Municipalities

Key Issues Addressed

Equity considerations icon

Sustainability Considerations

Sustainability considerations icon

Sub-geographies

Equity Considerations

Adds transparency to funding development to ensure equitable distribution and investment.

Intentional allocation of staffing and investment sources ensure longevity of funding and governance.

Related Planning Topic Areas

Not Municipalities
Not Sub-geographies
Countywide
Complete Communities icon

Complete Communities

Sustainable Infrastructure icon

Sustainable Infrastructure

Responsible Growth icon

Responsible Growth

Leading the Region icon

Leading the Region

Inclusive Economies icon

Inclusive Economies

Population Stagnation
Jobs-Skills Mismatch
Greater Housing Diversity & Affordability
Infrastructure Cost-burden
Social & Environmental Resilience
Economic Development
Housing
Land Use & Development
Open Space & Environment
Transportation & Infrastructure

Low
(Less than $1 mil)

Medium
($1-5 mil)

Partnership

Implementation

Lead Partner(s)

  • St. Louis County Department of Transportation and Public Works

Lead Partner(s) icon
Supporting Partner(s) icon

Timeline

Ongoing

Near-term
(Within 5 Years)

Supporting Partner(s)

  • St. Louis County Department of Planning

  • St. Louis Economic Development Partnership

Project

Cost

High
($10+ mil)

Project, Partnership, or Policy

Policy

Medium-term
(5-10 Years)

Long-term
(10+ Years)

Potential Funding Sources

  • St. Louis County Government general operations

Not Partnership
Not Project
Policy

Tracking Implementation

Implementation tracker icon.

Add environmental sustainability impact within development process.

Tracking Success

  • Number of development projects that are reviewed.

  • Number of development projects approved.

  • Investment amount of infrastructure improvements.

If overperforming, what should we do?

Eliminate reporting as a requirement to development review process.

If underperforming, what should we do?

Previous
Previous

CC.48/Implement traffic-calming measures such as speed tables, curb extensions, mid-block /PS/IC/SER

Next
Next

CC.50/Facilitate a comprehensive distribution of community gardens, farmers markets, Food Co-/PS/SER